Why should I answer you when clearly you think my perception is wrong, it is wasting both of our time. Ji, you are failing to realize that all is Part of Sri Vaheguru Sahib ji, which includes them. Nirguna and Sarguna are 2 forms of Sri Vaheguru ji which come in play throughout the ages, no? Can you show me where it says Sri Krishna ji could not realize atman is Sri Vaheguru Sahib ji? Also show me where it criticizes! It makes no sense to criticize something when everything happens due to hukam and all is thus perfect since it is how God planned it to be. :
pIq bsn kuMd dsn ipRA sihq kMT mwl muktu sIis mor pMK cwih jIau ] (1402-19)
peet basan kund dasan pari-a sahit kanth maal mukat sees mor pankh chaahi jee-o.
As Krishna, You wear yellow robes, with teeth like jasmine flowers; You dwell with Your lovers, with Your mala around Your neck, and You joyfully adorn Your head with the crow of peacock feathers.
peet=yellow
basan= vastra(clothes)
kanth=neck
mala=necklace
mukut=crown
sees=head
mor=peacock
pankh=feathers
(description of Sri Krishna ji)
as for 'kund dasan pari-a sahit' you can help me with the meaning of that if you'd like!!
It is awfully flawed for you to think that throughout the ages there were no satgurus, because what God would make an age without dharma? Oh wait, I just remembered that you consider 'hinduism' lowly. Well let me tell you that out of hindus or anyone else the wise is the gyani (which can be any).
↧