You started mocking Sants by saying they were against phones, not only that but after I showed you the tradition is actually religious orientated you're still refusing to acknowledge it. You refuse to accept that a Sant's avasta has merged with the lord so they only speak the truth. You stated only Maharaj was infalliable, indirectly implying Sant Ji is fallible. Maharaj is infallible but so are his Sants. When a Sant says something its 100% true, it isn't "advise" its something to contemplate and incorporate into life.
There's audio for this, Stop comparing something that can be corrupted over time to something thats a measly few decades (max) old. Rehitname are not the speech of Mahapurkh, in many cases they are paraphrased passed along from mouth to mouth and even changed, and in other cases they come as a biproduct of a time and certain condition. This is direct Bachan of a Mahapurkh, only a morakh would reject something as conclusive as this.
This is audio proof, why is it so hard for you to simply accept they know better. Yet you go off on a tangent and start sprouting nonsense about concept you didn't even bother to relay.
Bro If Gurbani tells you to reject them then reject them. They aren't the whole truth which is the whole crux of this argument. I've had to spell it out for you how it is a Spiritual thread, yet you're purposely refusing to accept it because it means having to concede the point. Unless you can provide any proof its considered ok in Sikhism then please go for it, So far you've contradicted yourself multiple times. You said Gurbani is against Spiritual threads, i just showed how it is a spiritual thread. Now you're trying to change the entire crux of the argument.
There's a difference between studying them and accepting them. I studied creationism in my RE class, doesn't mean I accept it. I was able to learn where it comes from, why it exists and why Creationists can easily become confused by it.
@thebolded Why are you putting this on me. Guru Gobind Singh Ji was the one who told us to reject them, every Sant will tell you Gurbani is supreme, the other Scriptures have corruptions within them (along with truth) however thread tying is part of the corrupt as its used for spiritual purposes. I've shown this by referencing from actual Hindu sites who know more than you or I do regarding them, but clearly your own ego won't accept it.
It's a Spiritual thread since the very Puranas which started the tradition introduced it as such. So by default its anti-Gurmat.
In this entire thread you have not provided a single ounce of proof fro any reasonable source while parroting that you don't have the avasta to post Gurbani. When a Mahapurkh speaks out against it you try to discredit him in a vain attempt to appear self-righteous.
If anyone has any doubts read the Puranas and ask actual Hindus about it. They'll tell you its a Spiritual thread, the very thing You are rejecting but refusing to accept because it doesn't coincide with your own views about it all. Do not push this on anyone else, Guru Sahib said to consider Gurbani Supreme, he also told us to reject vedic scriptures but you clearly know more than Guru Sahib or Sant Ji so please continue living in your own delusions I will say one thing though, those that craftily try to attack sants like this are doomed for countless reincarnations. Show some humility and take what Sant Ji said as the truth and stop living under your own Ego, Gurbani tells us to recite Gurbani under their guidance and listen to them as though they are the lord (which their state is).
I'm pretty much done in all this, I've posted proof which saw its from Puranas and a Spiritual thread, however MrDoaba here clearly knows more than those scriptures and gurbani or even Sant Ji.
↧