Hazoor Sahib as Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji left it is very different than how it is today. Many false practices are taking place at Hazoor Sahib today. Not to mention it's run by a RSS leader/member currently by the name of Amrik Singh Varsikar.
Buddha Dal claim their lineage goes back to the Sixth Guru and is named after Baba Budha ji. Amrit was first introduced by Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji as Charan Pahul. Bhai Gurdas ji has wrote this history in his vaaran (vaar 1, pauri 23). Bhai Gurdas ji writes Sikhs were given Charan Pahul by the Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji. There was no stipulation on which gender can take Charan Pahul or who can't, clearly stated Sikhs. Sixth Guru kept up the lineage of Charan Pahul as Amrit from the Punj Pyare started much later in 1699. Since Buddha Dal wants to claim their lineage all the way back to the first war fought by Sikhs (which were at the time of Sixth Guru), this would mean Buddha Dal followed Charan Pahul from the Guru given to Sikhs, which includes males and females. So the question for you to answer now is, what changed from Charan Pahul to Punj Pyare where women were never given Khande Di Pahul? This is your claim, women were never given amrit from the Punj Pyare, so substantiate it and tells us what changed. Provide references to where you find the answers and links, so you can be given a good lesson. Little kids shouldn`t play with fire...
Well when you define Sikhi including manmat practices, then its very easily for the locals to follow that fake version of Sikhi. It's like the other deras who allow their followers to drink and smoke. All they have to do is make a false claim they are apart of the dera and like magic the dera followers are much stronger in their beliefs. Kesh and shastar only help when the shackles of manmat practices are lifted off the head. These poor people are enslaved by hindu rituals in the disguise of a Sikh identity.
So what, they worship the very devta and devis Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji tells them not to worship in Sri Dasam Granth Sahib ji.
Very confusing sentences, but I believe you are saying, the Hazoor Sahib leaders had no problem with mahants bringing murtis in Gurdwaras. If so, then you don`t have the basic understanding of Gurbani from Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji or Sri Dasam Granth Sahib ji. Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji called the murti worshipper a murakh (completely blind) and Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji says, he break murtis. The first and 10 Guru have made it crystal clear on not to allow murtis in Gurdwaras, which will basically turn into murti worship. Mahant were bringing in murtis of devta and devis who were never to be worshipped. So take your head out of the murti and maybe start reading Gurbani.
If you are going to believe the claim of Naamdharis, then you also must believe Baba Ram Singh ji said he was the Guru of the Sikhs. Here I will give you a better example of your illogical reasoning. I was the first one to claim this poster, Mahakaal is a pandit terrorist who believes in cow worship. I claimed it, now it must be true. So mahakaal how does it feels to drink the urine of cows as you worship them.
↧
