This is coming from a person who used said a reason didn't exist and then turned around and said a doesn't exist because the second reason which I already said didn't happens is the reason why the first claim never happened. Also it's coming from a person who changed his position after being caught in his illerate assessment of Khande da Amrit, once charan pahul factual point was brought up and was given to both genders without any stipulation. Here let me show you
This is the first time you have mentioned kirpan amrit and never say it in your first post. You do say the following:
Then later in the post you speak about amrit and say the following:
If you had not changed your position, the above would have said women were first given kirpan amrit by Buddha dal and naamdhari were the first to give khande da amrit. Let's say you made a mistake and was not clear on your post. Okay, I'm giving you a chance to clear it up. So one member quotes your post and poster jkvlondon gives you and example of Mata Bhago Kaur taking amrit. Now here is a perfect chance for clown college poster mahakaal to clear up according to his beliefs, woman did take amrit but they took kirpan amrit. But this never happens instead poster mahakaal writes the following:
In the same post poster mahakaal is asking for proof of women taking amrit when he himself want to change his position later to say women were given amrit through kirpan amrit. Here it is:
Now poster jkvlondon directly challenged you to present evidence to say Mata Bhao Kaur never took amrit. You did not provide any comment saying women were given kirpan amrit. Instead you say no women were given amrit. Clown college has done a number on your ability use logic. But let's go with your clown college taught rationality and say you made a mistake and forgot to mention women were given kirpan amrit.
In his last post before he is presented with charan pahul being given to all Sikhs regardless of gender he writes the following. Again, I am giving him a lot to clear up his post and he had three post where he could have cleared up amrit was given to women through kirpan the amrit. But in his last post he repeats what he said in the first two post. Here it is:
Nope didn't clear it up here either. Such a crucial point of how women were given amrit after being challenged by two poster and this clown college member couldn't remember to write women took amrit through kirpan amrit? Poster mahakaal, I officially give you the title of Mr. Bigly Trump. Then to add damage to insult he makes up the following example of how Punj Pyare would have to take amrit with their wives as a previous poster said a spouse can't take amrit without their spouse. Here it is:
Read the first line, again he ask for proof for women receiving amrit. Amrit and women being or not being given amrit was clearly in his head, but his clown college brain couldn't pull out of his thick head, oooooo by the way women were given kirpan amrit. This poster mahakaal clearly changed his position after I presented charan pahul was given to all Sikhs regardless of gender and in the same way. I can't believe I am wasting my time on this thick headed child. I told him don't play with fire, but Mr. Bigly Trump couldn't resist. Chalo let's get into rest of his nonsense post.
Humpty dumpty claims there is no evidence of him sitting on the wall, so how could he fall off the wall? I will provide evidence humpty dumpty sat on the wall after you provide what evidence Hazur Sahib Sikhs and Buddha dal have to say women never took khande da amrit.
Okay, finally some hint of honesty. But I won't take the bait. Provide evidence for Mata Sundri ji and Mata Sahib Kaur ji as well. You made the claim and now it's time to present it. And no humpty dumpty business.
For the same reason naamdhari claim Baba Ram Singh says he was the next Guru of the Sikhs. baba Ram Singh ji never claimed he was the Guru, but naamdhari continue to do so. Again stop with the humpty dumpty business or I will be forced to call you Mr. Bigly Trump from this day forward.
Okay, I'm drop the clown college business because I can see your problem. I won't mention it here because it will only embarrass you even more than you have been. The Punj Pyare took amrit and so did Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji from the Punj Pyare and then Sikhs from the sangat took amrit. Which may or may not have included the Punj Pyare wives and Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji's wife. DamDami Taksal Rehat Maryada was written after Amrit was given to the sangat. Spouses receiving amrit together is instructions for Sikhs. Just to stay consistent, provide evidence on 1699 Amrit was given and it was given in the way you want to promote it.
I clearly said before addressing your murti comment, your sentence is not clear. The murti got into Sri Harmandir Sahib because the British allowed it as the British had control of Sri Harmandir Sahib at the time. British didn't really care about Hazur Sahib because the hub, main place where Sikhs got directions from was Sri Akal Takht Sahib. Yet Hazur Sahib still was corrupted by the very same people who were set to protect it.
In this whole mess of a post, you never answered my question, why would women not be given khande da amrit when they were equally given charan pahul? Since you changed your position. Here is another question, why are women given kirpan amrit and men are given khande da amrit according to your proof. If you have not caught on yet, I want proof for all your claims. You asked others for proof and now it's only fair to ask proof from you. I will be waiting for this proof. Don't run and hide.
↧